Клуб любителей Пежо

Текущее время: 24 мар 2019 09:14

Часовой пояс: UTC + 3 часа [ Летнее время ]

Начать новую тему Ответить на тему  [ 1 сообщение ] 
Автор Сообщение
 Заголовок сообщения: However, despite the Packers finishing . Jersey
СообщениеДобавлено: 08 мар 2019 06:43 
Не в сети

Зарегистрирован: 29 ноя 2018 11:25
Сообщений: 67
Благодарил (а): 0 раз.
Поблагодарили: 0 раз.
The Packers’ race for WR jobs won’t just be based on who is best in training camp Training camp feels like the ultimate meritocracy Youth Jaire Alexander Jersey , where the proverbial cream rises to the top (and is used to make cheese curds). Players do have to perform to get onto the field, but players with big numbers next to their names on the salary cap or with low numbers next to their name on the draft chart get the benefit of the doubt. Jaire Alexander and Josh Jackson ran with the starters long before they proved they were good enough to play there. Building a team is no different, which complicates the handicapping of the receiver battle being waged in the Green Bay Packers’ training camp because the best players might not be the ones to make the final roster. At least not all of them. This discussion, of course, centers around the man APC’s Paul Noonan dubbed “The Great Whitewater Hope,” Jake Kumerow. His ascendence as a reliable target and an Aaron Rodgers favorite muddies the already murky receiver waters. Before Kumerow broke out, a trio of rookies were set to battle Trevor Davis and Michael Clark in what was likely five players battling for no more than three spots. Davante Adams, Randall Cobb, and Geronimo Allison have the top three positions locked down for now.Clark made things a little easier on Mike McCarthy and the Packers front office by retiring early despite his estimable physical gifts. Meanwhile, injuries have prevented Davis from creating any forward momentum as anything other than a returner on this roster, so with two down, that leaves is with six players. However, adding in the 6’4’’ former UDFA who has proven to be one of the most reliable receivers in camp — full stop — could push one of these other promising young talents off the roster. Not so fast.The decision about who to keep and who to cut won’t simply be made based on who had the best camp or showed the most in preseason games. J’Mon Moore would have to be pretty bad to get the axe given his fourth-round draft position. Equanimeous St. Brown stands as the closest thing to a lock of the rookies, showing the most consistency with his hands and chemistry with QB1. Marquez Valdes-Scantling probably has the most pure athletic ability of the rookies, but he’ll make one “wow” play a practice followed by one “whoops” play. For all their flaws, each is more physically gifted than Kumerow. During a press conference, Brian Gutekunst said this week the rookies need time just to get in position to show their talent. Getting a receiver up to NFL is no easy task and Kumerow has a three-year head start. Of course he looks more polished. Here’s the rub for Kumerow: a fourth receiver (at best) won’t be the difference between making the Super Bowl and coming up short. Furthermore, the marginal difference between Kumerow and EQ, for example, isn’t big enough to give up on the younger, more talented draft pick. St. Brown isn’t making it through waivers. Neither is Moore, who had plenty of fans pre-draft.Could the tantalizing physical potential of MVS cause another NFL to scoop him up? Perhaps, but this is the first week of August. Every team has a player like him —a raw, unrefined pass catcher with upside—they’re trying to develop. What he looks like in three weeks could be drastically different, but there are also myriad players around the league with similar fringe roster profiles.Of those four though, Kumerow would seemingly be the most obvious choice to clear waivers. Teams have had plenty of opportunities to see him in camps and exhibition games and passed. Seemingly every year, Packers fans fall in love with a fringe roster receiver they know for sure won’t make it through waivers Womens Tramon Williams Jersey , and every year he does. More to the point though, how much better can he get? What is his upside relative to these rookies? Or even Trevor Davis? If the Packers had to play the Bears at Lambeau today, Kumerow would be one of the four best receivers, but they don’t. And what’s more, one game or one season won’t be the deciding factor here.The cagey move could be to keep all seven with Aaron Jones set to serve a suspension, then cut one during the season once Jones returns. With rosters around the NFL more solidified, it’s unlikely a team would sign one of these guys outright, leaving only a practice squad bid. Brian Gutekunst could roll the dice that way, a reasonable gamble on what is already a fringe player.This is the NFL’s version of a champagne problem. What are the Packers to do with so many receivers? It’s a problem a team like the Cowboys would love to have. Green Bay drafted three guys because Gutekunst and company wanted more competition at the position. If nothing else, the nascent Kumerow should push these rookies to the brink. Though it’s hard to imagine he’d play well enough to actually squeeze them off the roster, Kumerow could force the Packers to make some very difficult decisions, to take a gamble. But the decision won’t be made with eyes only toward the 2018 season.The question isn’t just “Who can help the most this season?” but rather “Who can help the most over the next two or three season?” So long as these rookies show progress, it will become harder to argue Kumerow’s reliability with a lower ceiling makes more sense on the roster. All three rookies should be better a year from now. Green Bay wants to win the Super Bowl this season, but they also want to win it next season and the year after that. Unless Kumerow is the missing piece to that run (he’s not), is his reliability worth losing the upside of these other players? The Packers track record with draft picks and young players suggests they would say no. After looking at the Green Bay Packers’ offensive statistics in 2018, it’s time to take a look at their numbers on defense — which were pretty offensive in their own right. Green Bay’s defense looks like a league-average unit on paper, but when you examine the numbers on a per-play basis, things start to break down.It was a tough first year for new defensive coordinator Mike Pettine, particularly on the personnel front. Only three players who entered training camp as starters remained on the active roster by week 17: Blake Martinez, Clay Matthews, and Tramon Williams, who had switched positions. With his unit in a constant state of flux due to injury, Pettine had to cobble together game plans with waiver acquisitions and undrafted rookies playing significant roles for weeks at a time.Pettine may or may not return for 2019, depending on the opinion of the team’s next head coach. If he does retain his job, one thing is certain — he’ll need to see the team’s numbers improve next season to remain for 2020 and beyond.Conventional StatsOverallMike Pettine’s unit finished 22nd in points allowed and 18th in total yards allowed. However, they forced just 15 total turnovers in 16 games, fourth-fewest in the NFL.On third downs Womens Antonio Morrison Jersey , the defense actually held up fairly well. Opponents converted 37.3% of their third down opportunities, the 13th-best mark in the league. However, they also converted two-thirds of fourth-down chances. In the red zone, the Packers allowed touchdowns on just over 60% of opportunities, ranking them 20th.PassingGreen Bay’s revolving door of defensive backs managed to hold the opposition to the 12th-fewest total passing yards of any NFL team. That’s nice on its face, but that was helped out by a lower number of pass attempts, since the Packers found themselves trailing frequently. On a per-play basis, opponents’ 6.6 net yards per attempt number was a bit higher than the league average of 6.42 and ranked the team 21st in the league.While the pass rush was able to generate a large number of sacks — 44, which ranked them tied for 8th in the league — turnovers did not follow. The Packers picked off just seven passes all season, tied with two other teams for the second-fewest number in the league. Only the San Francisco 49ers had fewer interceptions, as they recorded just two.RushingGreen Bay’s run defense was hammered much of the season, as teams ran the ball against them more than 26 other NFL teams. The injuries on the defensive line probably contributed to that, as did the fact that the Packers were often behind on the scoreboard and opponents tried to shorten the games. Green Bay allowed a yards-per-carry average of 4.3, around the league average of 4.4 and ranking 13th. DVOAOverall, Green Bay’s defense dropped nine spots in DVOA from 2017’s 20th-place finish, ranking 29th in 2018. That was largely due to the team’s awful pass defense ranking, which tends to be the biggest driver of overall rank; of the bottom ten overall defenses, only one — Kansas City — had a pass defense better than 20th in pass DVOA (they were 12th).However, the Packers were near the bottom of the league against both the pass and the run, leading to their overall ranking. One other note is that the Packers faced the fourth-easiest schedule in the NFL by opponents’ offensive DVOA, which helps explain why their adjusted results were worse than their raw scores. Finally, the Packers ranked second-last in variance, meaning the team’s performance changed week-to-week more than all but one other team.PassingDespite that 21st ranking in NY/A referenced above, the Packers’ pass DVOA rating was +20.1%, ranking them 28th in the league. Against wide receivers, the Packers were a bit better, ranking 22nd against #1s Womens Corey Linsley Jersey , 25th against #2s, and 16th against others. However, tight ends and running backs killed Green Bay’s pass defense, as they ranked 27th against the tight end position and dead last against running backs.In terms of directional numbers, the Packers were at their best when defending passes to the right side of the defense (left side of the offense). Probably not coincidentally, that was the side where Jaire Alexander tended to line up most often. On passes in that direction, they actually were above-average in DVOA at -0.2%, but they were 29th on passes to the middle (31.5%) and 30th on passes to the left (12.6%). They were also equally bad on short and deep passes, ranking 29th against both; their +76.9% rating against deep left passes was the league’s worst. RushingGreen Bay’s rushing defense was 23rd in the NFL in DVOA this season, which shows a significant difference from their yards per attempt rank of 13th. It’s a bit difficult to pin down a firm reason for this difference, particularly because the Packers ranked 10th in success rate allowed in “power” situations (defined as third or fourth downs or goal-to-go rushes with two or fewer yards to convert). Perhaps the issue lies in the fact that the Packers stuffed runs for no gain or losses at a rate well-below the league average of 19.3%. Green Bay ranked just 29th with a stuff rate of 14.6%. Furthermore, the Packers allowed big runs at a fairly low clip, ranking in the ten best teams in the league in the proportions of yards allowed on 5-plus and 10-plus-yard runs.That suggests that the Packers allowed opponents to pick up 4-5 yards consistently rather than being a boom-or-bust type of rushing defense where the offense would either be stuffed or pick up big gains. ConclusionsMuch of the struggles of the Packers’ defense can again be attributed to a lack of turnovers. Mike Pettine’s group seemed to operate much in the same way that Dom Capers’ units did in that they allowed fairly large yardage totals while failing to take the football away with regularity. For example, the Packers forced just six turnovers over the season’s final ten games. The Packers also won every game in which the defense forced more than one turnover; that happened four times, against the Bills, 49ers, Dolphins, and Falcons.Sure, a healthier secondary can probably help with that. However, despite the Packers finishing as a top-ten unit in sacks, they forced just 15 turnovers all season long. Some of that may simply be bad luck — quarterbacks able to hold on to the football when being sacked better than average, for example — but next year’s defensive coordinator must find a way to generate more takeaways for this unit to be successful.The other way to help the defense will be for the offense to be more effective, both in sustaining drives to keep the defense off the field and in scoring early and giving the team a lead. The latter would help put opposing teams in more passing situations, where a creative coordinator like Pettine can dial up blitzes and hopefully force more turnovers.

Вернуться наверх
Показать сообщения за:  Сортировать по:  
Начать новую тему Ответить на тему  [ 1 сообщение ] 

Часовой пояс: UTC + 3 часа [ Летнее время ]

Кто сейчас на форуме

Сейчас этот форум просматривают: нет зарегистрированных пользователей и гости: 2

Вы не можете начинать темы
Вы не можете отвечать на сообщения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения
Вы не можете удалять свои сообщения
Вы не можете добавлять вложения


Клуб владельцев Пежо 408 - Пежо 408